Poker HUD Stats Glossary

The total number of hands a player has played in your database. This is the foundation of all HUD statistics - the larger the sample size, the more reliable and accurate all other stats become. Small samples (under 100 hands) can be misleading, while larger samples (500+ hands) provide much more trustworthy data for making decisions.

Voluntarily Put Money In Pot - The percentage of hands a player voluntarily puts money into the pot preflop (excludes big blind when not raised). A fundamental stat showing how loose or tight a player is. Typical ranges: Tight (15-20%), Loose (25-35%), Very Loose (40%+).

Preflop Raise - The percentage of hands a player raises preflop. Shows aggression level and hand selection. Good players typically have PFR close to their VPIP (within 5-10%). Large gaps suggest passive play.

The percentage of times a player reraises preflop when facing a raise. Shows aggression and hand strength. Typical ranges: Tight (2-4%), Aggressive (6-10%), Very Aggressive (12%+).

The percentage of times a player reraises when facing a 3-bet preflop. This is the fourth betting action in a hand and indicates very strong hands or advanced bluffing. Typical ranges: Tight (1-2%), Aggressive (3-5%), Very Aggressive (6%+). Usually indicates premium hands like AA, KK, QQ, AK.

Measures post-flop aggression by calculating (Bets + Raises) / Calls. Higher values indicate more aggressive play. Ranges: Passive (<1), Balanced (1-3), Aggressive (3-5), Very Aggressive (5+).

Measures post-flop aggression as a percentage: (Bets + Raises) / every post-flop action taken, counting bets, raises, calls and folds (checks are excluded). Unlike AF it is bounded 0-100%, so it stays readable at small samples where one bet with no calls would send AF to infinity. Ranges: Passive (<30%), Balanced (30-45%), Aggressive (45-60%), Very Aggressive (60%+). Shown alongside AF because the two answer different questions: AF is how much you bet relative to calling, AFq is how often you take the aggressive line at all.

Went To Showdown - Percentage of hands that go to showdown when the player sees the flop. Shows how often a player follows through to the end. Typical range: 25-35%.

Won Money at Showdown - Percentage of money won when going to showdown. Indicates hand strength and value betting ability. Good players typically show 50%+ over large samples.

Continuation Bet - Percentage of times a player bets the flop after raising preflop. Shows aggression and betting patterns. Typical ranges: 60-80% depending on position and opponents.

Percentage of times a player folds when facing a continuation bet. Shows how easily a player gives up. Higher percentages suggest the player can be bluffed post-flop.

Percentage of times a player attempts to steal the blinds from late position (cutoff, button, small blind). Shows positional awareness and aggression. Typical range: 25-40%.

The percentage of hands a player open limps preflop — calling the big blind instead of raising when first to enter the pot. High limp percentages typically indicate passive, recreational players. Strong players rarely limp, preferring to raise or fold.

Percentage of times a player folds their blinds to a steal attempt. Shows how defendable their blind play is. Tight players show higher percentages (80%+).

A forced bet that all players must make before a hand begins, separate from blinds. Common in tournaments and some cash games to increase action.

The larger of two forced bets in poker, typically double the small blind. The player two seats clockwise from the dealer button posts this bet.

The dealer position, marked by a button. This player acts last in all betting rounds except preflop, making it the most advantageous position.

To pass the action to the next player without betting, only possible when no bet has been made in the current round.

To match the current bet amount to stay in the hand. Shows the minimum commitment to continue playing the hand.

To increase the current bet amount, forcing other players to call the new amount, fold, or reraise to continue in the hand.

To surrender your hand and forfeit any money already contributed to the pot. The hand is over for that player.

To bet all of your remaining chips. Creates side pots if other players have more chips and want to continue betting.

The ratio of the current pot size to the cost of a call. Used to determine if a call is mathematically profitable based on hand equity.

The best possible hand on any given board. For example, on a board of A♠ K♠ Q♠ J♠ 10♠, a royal flush would be the nuts. Having the nuts means no other hand can beat you at that moment. Also called 'the stone cold nuts' when absolutely unbeatable.

Your seat relative to the dealer button, determining when you act. Later positions (closer to button) are generally more advantageous because you have more information about the other players' actions.

The first seats to act preflop in full ring (9-handed) play, consisting of Under the Gun (UTG), UTG+1, and UTG+2. These positions are disadvantageous as you must act first with limited information about other players' intentions. Requires tighter hand selection.

The middle seats in full ring play, typically consisting of LJ, HJ, and sometimes CO (seats 4-6 from the button). These positions offer moderate information and allow for slightly looser play than early position, but still require caution.

The most advantageous positions in full ring play, consisting of the Cutoff (CO) and Button. These positions act last postflop, providing maximum information about opponents' actions. Allows for the widest range of playable hands and aggressive strategies.

Independent Chip Model - A mathematical model used to calculate the value of tournament chips based on payout structure and remaining players. Critical for final table decisions.

Game Theory Optimal - A strategy that cannot be exploited by opponents. While theoretically perfect, it may not be maximally profitable against suboptimal players.

The entire spectrum of hands a player might have in a given situation. Good players think in ranges rather than trying to put opponents on specific hands.

Your hand's percentage chance of winning against an opponent's range at any given moment. Changes as community cards are revealed.

Potential winnings in future betting rounds relative to the current cost of calling. Considers not just current pot odds but future value.

The potential to lose additional money in future betting rounds even when you improve your hand. Common with draws to second-best hands.

Cards in your hand that reduce the likelihood of opponents having certain strong hands. Used in advanced bluffing and value betting decisions.

A betting range consisting of very strong hands and bluffs, with medium-strength hands removed. Common in river betting scenarios.

A betting range that includes strong hands, medium hands, and some bluffs. More common in earlier streets and smaller bet sizes.

How the community cards interact with each other and typical hand ranges. Wet boards offer many draws; dry boards offer fewer.

Stack-to-Pot Ratio - The ratio of effective stack size to pot size. Influences optimal play strategy; lower SPR favors commitment with top pair type hands.

Calling a bet with a weak hand or draw, intending to bluff on a later street when opponent shows weakness. Requires good position and read.

When one player's range contains significantly more of the strongest possible hands (nuts) on a given board than their opponent's range. This advantage allows for more aggressive betting strategies, as the player with nut advantage can represent the strongest hands more credibly.

When one player's entire range of hands performs better on a particular board texture than their opponent's range. This can be due to nut advantage, better pair combinations, or more draws. The player with range advantage should generally bet more frequently.

How well a player's range connects with or covers the possible strong hands on a given board. Good board coverage means having many combinations of sets, two pairs, straights, and flushes that are possible on that texture.

Saw the flop % (of hands dealt). Street-seen rates show how deep into hands a player goes. Combined with VPIP they separate fit-or-fold players from ones who peel and keep peeling. Computed as flop seen out of total hands played.

Saw the turn % (of flops seen). Street-seen rates show how deep into hands a player goes. Combined with VPIP they separate fit-or-fold players from ones who peel and keep peeling. Computed as turn seen out of flop seen.

Saw the river % (of turns seen). Street-seen rates show how deep into hands a player goes. Combined with VPIP they separate fit-or-fold players from ones who peel and keep peeling. Computed as river seen out of turn seen.

Flop aggression factor: (bets + raises) / calls. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as (flop bets + flop raises) divided by flop calls.

Flop aggression frequency: (bets + raises) / all actions. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as flop bets + flop raises out of flop actions.

Folded when facing a flop bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as flop folded to bet out of flop faced bet.

Called when facing a flop bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as flop called bet out of flop faced bet.

Raised when facing a flop bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as flop raised bet out of flop faced bet.

Turn aggression factor: (bets + raises) / calls. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as (turn bets + turn raises) divided by turn calls.

Turn aggression frequency: (bets + raises) / all actions. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as turn bets + turn raises out of turn actions.

Folded when facing a turn bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as turn folded to bet out of turn faced bet.

Called when facing a turn bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as turn called bet out of turn faced bet.

Raised when facing a turn bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as turn raised bet out of turn faced bet.

River aggression factor: (bets + raises) / calls. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as (river bets + river raises) divided by river calls.

River aggression frequency: (bets + raises) / all actions. Per-street aggression separates flop stabbers from rivers-only value bettors. AF compares betting to calling; AFq is the share of all actions that are aggressive — bounded 0–100% so it stays readable at small samples. Computed as river bets + river raises out of river actions.

Folded when facing a river bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as river folded to bet out of river faced bet.

Called when facing a river bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as river called bet out of river faced bet.

Raised when facing a river bet %. The raw fold/call/raise split when facing a bet on each street — the widest-sample version of street defense, before filtering to c-bet or donk contexts. Computed as river raised bet out of river faced bet.

VPIP from SB. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the small blind out of hands from the small blind.

PFR from SB. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the small blind out of hands from the small blind.

Raised first in from SB % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the small blind out of raises first in opportunities from the small blind.

VPIP from BB. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the big blind out of hands from the big blind.

PFR from BB. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the big blind out of hands from the big blind.

Raised first in from BB % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the big blind out of raises first in opportunities from the big blind.

VPIP from UTG. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from utg out of hands from utg.

PFR from UTG. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from utg out of hands from utg.

Raised first in from UTG % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from utg out of raises first in opportunities from utg.

VPIP from UTG+1. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from utg+1 out of hands from utg+1.

PFR from UTG+1. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from utg+1 out of hands from utg+1.

Raised first in from UTG+1 % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from utg+1 out of raises first in opportunities from utg+1.

VPIP from UTG+2. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from utg+2 out of hands from utg+2.

PFR from UTG+2. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from utg+2 out of hands from utg+2.

Raised first in from UTG+2 % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from utg+2 out of raises first in opportunities from utg+2.

VPIP from LJ. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the lojack out of hands from the lojack.

PFR from LJ. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the lojack out of hands from the lojack.

Raised first in from LJ % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the lojack out of raises first in opportunities from the lojack.

VPIP from HJ. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the hijack out of hands from the hijack.

PFR from HJ. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the hijack out of hands from the hijack.

Raised first in from HJ % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the hijack out of raises first in opportunities from the hijack.

VPIP from CO. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the cutoff out of hands from the cutoff.

PFR from CO. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the cutoff out of hands from the cutoff.

Raised first in from CO % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the cutoff out of raises first in opportunities from the cutoff.

VPIP from BTN. Positional VPIP shows how much a player widens or tightens by seat. A big gap between button and UTG marks positional awareness; flat numbers across seats mark someone playing their cards, not their position. Computed as vpip from the button out of hands from the button.

PFR from BTN. Positional PFR reveals where a player’s aggression actually comes from. Compare it with their positional VPIP: a wide gap in any seat means lots of calling, not raising, from there. Computed as pfr from the button out of hands from the button.

Raised first in from BTN % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in from the button out of raises first in opportunities from the button.

Raised first in % (when folded to). Raise First In measures open-raising when the pot is unopened and everyone before has folded — the cleanest read on opening ranges, uncontaminated by limps or raises ahead. Computed as raises first in out of raises first in opportunities.

Over-limped % (limped behind an earlier limper). Over-limping (limping behind an earlier limper) is far more reasonable than open-limping, but a high number still marks a passive, multiway-oriented player. Computed as over limp out of over limp opportunities.

Called a raise after limping %. What a limper does when raised is one of the fastest player-type reads in poker: chronic limp-callers pay off isolation raises, limp-folders surrender dead money, and limp-raisers are usually trapping with premiums. Computed as limp call out of limp faced raise.

Folded to a raise after limping %. What a limper does when raised is one of the fastest player-type reads in poker: chronic limp-callers pay off isolation raises, limp-folders surrender dead money, and limp-raisers are usually trapping with premiums. Computed as limp fold out of limp faced raise.

Limp-raised %. What a limper does when raised is one of the fastest player-type reads in poker: chronic limp-callers pay off isolation raises, limp-folders surrender dead money, and limp-raisers are usually trapping with premiums. Computed as limp raise out of limp faced raise.

Raised to isolate limpers %. Isolation raising attacks limpers to get heads-up in position against a weak range. The fold-to-iso side shows whether limping ranges give up when pressured. Computed as iso out of iso opportunities.

Folded to an isolation raise after limping %. Isolation raising attacks limpers to get heads-up in position against a weak range. The fold-to-iso side shows whether limping ranges give up when pressured. Computed as fold to iso out of faced iso.

Cold called an open raise %. Cold calling — calling an open raise with no money already in — caps the caller’s range (their strongest hands would 3-bet). The per-opener splits show whether they respect early-position opens more than late steals. Computed as cold call out of cold call opportunities.

Cold called vs an open from EP %. Cold calling — calling an open raise with no money already in — caps the caller’s range (their strongest hands would 3-bet). The per-opener splits show whether they respect early-position opens more than late steals. Computed as cold call vs ep out of cold call opportunities vs ep.

Cold called vs an open from MP %. Cold calling — calling an open raise with no money already in — caps the caller’s range (their strongest hands would 3-bet). The per-opener splits show whether they respect early-position opens more than late steals. Computed as cold call vs mp out of cold call opportunities vs mp.

Cold called vs an open from LP %. Cold calling — calling an open raise with no money already in — caps the caller’s range (their strongest hands would 3-bet). The per-opener splits show whether they respect early-position opens more than late steals. Computed as cold call vs lp out of cold call opportunities vs lp.

Cold called vs an open from Blinds %. Cold calling — calling an open raise with no money already in — caps the caller’s range (their strongest hands would 3-bet). The per-opener splits show whether they respect early-position opens more than late steals. Computed as cold call vs the blinds out of cold call opportunities vs the blinds.

Called a preflop raise % (blinds included; cold call excludes them). Unlike cold call, this includes the blinds — the broadest "calls raises" read there is. High numbers mark station tendencies; pair it with fold-to-c-bet to find who calls preflop and gives up postflop. Computed as called pfr out of faced pfr.

Won the blinds unopened (walk) % of BB hands. A walk is winning the blinds without a fight. Mostly a table-passivity gauge — lots of walks means nobody is opening enough. Computed as walk out of hands from the big blind.

Steal took the blinds preflop %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal success out of steals made.

Steal attempt ended in a fold %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal then folded out of steals made.

Attempt to steal from CO %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal attempts from the cutoff out of steal attempts opportunities from the cutoff.

Attempt to steal from BTN %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal attempts from the button out of steal attempts opportunities from the button.

Attempt to steal from SB %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal attempts from the small blind out of steal attempts opportunities from the small blind.

Folded to a blind 3-bet after stealing %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal folded to blind3bet out of steal faced blind3bet.

Steal hand reached showdown %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal went to showdown out of steals made.

Steal hand won at showdown %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal won showdown out of steal went to showdown.

Steal hand won without showdown %. Steal stats cover late-position opens made to take the blinds. The attempt rate shows intent by seat; the outcome splits (taken preflop, folded later, went to showdown) show whether the steals actually make money. Computed as steal won no showdown out of steals made.

Folded BB to a steal %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as fold vs steal from the big blind out of vs steal from the big blind.

Called a steal from the BB %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as call vs steal from the big blind out of vs steal from the big blind.

3-bet a steal from the BB %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as raise vs steal from the big blind out of vs steal from the big blind.

Folded SB to a steal %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as fold vs steal from the small blind out of vs steal from the small blind.

Called a steal from the SB %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as call vs steal from the small blind out of vs steal from the small blind.

3-bet a steal from the SB %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as raise vs steal from the small blind out of vs steal from the small blind.

Folded BB to a steal from BTN %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as fold vs steal from the big blind from from the button out of vs steal from the big blind from from the button.

Folded BB to a steal from CO %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as fold vs steal from the big blind from from the cutoff out of vs steal from the big blind from from the cutoff.

Folded BB to a steal from SB %. Blind defense against steals is among the most exploitable numbers in poker: fold too much and steals print money against you; the per-stealer splits show whether the defender adjusts to who is stealing. Computed as fold vs steal from the big blind from from the small blind out of vs steal from the big blind from from the small blind.

Completed the SB %. Blind-vs-blind spots have the widest ranges in poker. These stats show whether a player fights for the smallest pots or concedes them. Computed as sb complete out of sb complete opportunities.

Raised limpers from the SB %. Blind-vs-blind spots have the widest ranges in poker. These stats show whether a player fights for the smallest pots or concedes them. Computed as sb raise vs limp out of sb raise vs limp opportunities.

Opened the SB blind-vs-blind %. Blind-vs-blind spots have the widest ranges in poker. These stats show whether a player fights for the smallest pots or concedes them. Computed as blind-vs-blind sb open out of blind-vs-blind sb open opportunities.

Defended the BB blind-vs-blind %. Blind-vs-blind spots have the widest ranges in poker. These stats show whether a player fights for the smallest pots or concedes them. Computed as blind-vs-blind bb defend out of blind-vs-blind bb defend opportunities.

Blind defense won at showdown %. Once a blind defense sees a flop, these track how it finishes — whether defended hands get to showdown and win there. Computed as def won showdown out of def went to showdown.

3-bet from SB %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the small blind out of three bet opportunities from the small blind.

3-bet from BB %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the big blind out of three bet opportunities from the big blind.

3-bet from UTG %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from utg out of three bet opportunities from utg.

3-bet from UTG+1 %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from utg+1 out of three bet opportunities from utg+1.

3-bet from UTG+2 %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from utg+2 out of three bet opportunities from utg+2.

3-bet from LJ %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the lojack out of three bet opportunities from the lojack.

3-bet from HJ %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the hijack out of three bet opportunities from the hijack.

3-bet from CO %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the cutoff out of three bet opportunities from the cutoff.

3-bet from BTN %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet from the button out of three bet opportunities from the button.

3-bet in position %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet ip out of three bet opportunities ip.

Folded to a 3-bet in position %. The response to a 3-bet defines how exploitable an opening range is: folding too much makes light 3-bets automatic profit, calling too much builds bloated pots out of position. Computed as fold to3bet ip out of faced3bet ip.

3-bet out of position %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet oop out of three bet opportunities oop.

Folded to a 3-bet out of position %. The response to a 3-bet defines how exploitable an opening range is: folding too much makes light 3-bets automatic profit, calling too much builds bloated pots out of position. Computed as fold to3bet oop out of faced3bet oop.

3-bet vs an open from EP %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet vs vs ep out of three bet opportunities vs vs ep.

3-bet vs an open from MP %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet vs vs mp out of three bet opportunities vs vs mp.

3-bet vs an open from LP %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet vs vs lp out of three bet opportunities vs vs lp.

3-bet vs an open from Blinds %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as three bet vs vs the blinds out of three bet opportunities vs vs the blinds.

Squeezed (3-bet over an open and caller) %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as squeeze out of squeeze opportunities.

Folded to a squeeze %. 3-bet splits by position, opener and in/out of position expose where the re-raises really come from. A player who 3-bets late-position opens far more than early opens is running a polarized, exploitative game; the squeeze variants (3-betting over an open plus callers) are its most leveraged form. Computed as fold to squeeze out of faced squeeze.

Called a 3-bet %. The response to a 3-bet defines how exploitable an opening range is: folding too much makes light 3-bets automatic profit, calling too much builds bloated pots out of position. Computed as call3bet out of faced3bet.

4-bet when facing a 3-bet %. The response to a 3-bet defines how exploitable an opening range is: folding too much makes light 3-bets automatic profit, calling too much builds bloated pots out of position. Computed as raise3bet out of faced3bet.

Cold 4-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as cold four bet out of cold four bet opportunities.

Folded to a 4-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as fold to4bet out of faced4bet.

Called a 4-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as call4bet out of faced4bet.

Raised over a 4-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as raise4bet out of faced4bet.

5-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as five bet out of five bet opportunities.

Folded to a 5-bet %. The 4-bet-and-beyond ladder is poker’s highest-leverage territory — tiny frequencies, huge pots. Deviations from tight baselines here are worth more than almost any other read. Computed as fold to5bet out of faced5bet.

Average open raise size (BB). Sizing tells are often the purest tells online: many players size up with value and down with bluffs (or the reverse). Compare a player’s average against the table standard. Computed as total open size sum bbx100 divided by open size count, shown in big blinds.

Average 3-bet size (BB). Sizing tells are often the purest tells online: many players size up with value and down with bluffs (or the reverse). Compare a player’s average against the table standard. Computed as total three bet size sum bbx100 divided by three bet size count, shown in big blinds.

Average 4-bet size (BB). Sizing tells are often the purest tells online: many players size up with value and down with bluffs (or the reverse). Compare a player’s average against the table standard. Computed as total four bet size sum bbx100 divided by four bet size count, shown in big blinds.

Flop continuation bet %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop out of cbet flop opportunities.

Folded to a flop c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop out of faced cbet on the flop.

Called a flop c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as call cbet on the flop out of faced cbet on the flop.

Raised a flop c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as raise cbet on the flop out of faced cbet on the flop.

Flop c-bets sized ≤33% pot (share of flop c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the flop out of cbet on the flop.

Flop c-bets sized 33–50% pot (share of flop c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the flop out of cbet on the flop.

Flop c-bets sized 50–75% pot (share of flop c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the flop out of cbet on the flop.

Flop c-bets sized 75–100% pot (share of flop c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the flop out of cbet on the flop.

Flop c-bets sized >100% pot (share of flop c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the flop out of cbet on the flop.

Turn continuation bet %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the turn out of cbet turn opportunities.

Folded to a turn c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the turn out of faced cbet on the turn.

Called a turn c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as call cbet on the turn out of faced cbet on the turn.

Raised a turn c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as raise cbet on the turn out of faced cbet on the turn.

Turn c-bets sized ≤33% pot (share of turn c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the turn out of cbet on the turn.

Turn c-bets sized 33–50% pot (share of turn c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the turn out of cbet on the turn.

Turn c-bets sized 50–75% pot (share of turn c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the turn out of cbet on the turn.

Turn c-bets sized 75–100% pot (share of turn c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the turn out of cbet on the turn.

Turn c-bets sized >100% pot (share of turn c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the turn out of cbet on the turn.

River continuation bet %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the river out of cbet river opportunities.

Folded to a river c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the river out of faced cbet on the river.

Called a river c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as call cbet on the river out of faced cbet on the river.

Raised a river c-bet %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as raise cbet on the river out of faced cbet on the river.

River c-bets sized ≤33% pot (share of river c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the river out of cbet on the river.

River c-bets sized 33–50% pot (share of river c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the river out of cbet on the river.

River c-bets sized 50–75% pot (share of river c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the river out of cbet on the river.

River c-bets sized 75–100% pot (share of river c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the river out of cbet on the river.

River c-bets sized >100% pot (share of river c-bets). The distribution of c-bet sizings shows whether a player uses one auto-size or splits their range — and whether a given size maps to strength. Computed as cbet size on the river out of cbet on the river.

Flop c-bet in position %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop ip out of cbet flop opportunities ip.

Flop c-bet out of position %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop oop out of cbet flop opportunities oop.

Flop c-bet heads-up %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop hu out of cbet flop opportunities hu.

Flop c-bet multiway %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop mw out of cbet flop opportunities mw.

Flop c-bet in a 3-bet pot %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop 3bp out of cbet flop opportunities 3bp.

Flop c-bet in a 4-bet pot %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop 4bp out of cbet flop opportunities 4bp.

Flop c-bet as the 3-bettor %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the flop as3bettor out of cbet flop opportunities as3bettor.

Folded to a flop c-bet in position %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop ip out of faced cbet on the flop ip.

Folded to a flop c-bet out of position %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop oop out of faced cbet on the flop oop.

Folded to a flop c-bet heads-up %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop hu out of faced cbet on the flop hu.

Folded to a flop c-bet multiway %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop mw out of faced cbet on the flop mw.

Folded to a flop c-bet in a 3-bet pot %. The response to c-bets is the bread-and-butter postflop exploit: high fold numbers green-light relentless c-betting; high raise numbers demand a tighter betting range. Computed as fold to cbet on the flop 3bp out of faced cbet on the flop 3bp.

Turn c-bet in position %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the turn ip out of cbet turn opportunities ip.

Turn c-bet out of position %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the turn oop out of cbet turn opportunities oop.

Turn c-bet in a 3-bet pot %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as cbet on the turn 3bp out of cbet turn opportunities 3bp.

Delayed c-bet on the turn %. Continuation betting by street and context (position, heads-up vs multiway, 3-bet pots) shows how far aggression persists past the flop. High flop / low turn c-bet marks the classic one-and-done player. Computed as delayed cbet turn out of delayed cbet turn opportunities.

Check-raised the flop %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise on the flop out of check-raise opportunities on the flop.

Check-called the flop %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise call on the flop out of check-raise opportunities on the flop.

Check-folded the flop %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise fold on the flop out of check-raise opportunities on the flop.

Donk bet the flop %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as donk on the flop out of donk opportunities on the flop.

Folded to a flop donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as fold to donk on the flop out of faced donk on the flop.

Called a flop donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as call donk on the flop out of faced donk on the flop.

Raised a flop donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as raise donk on the flop out of faced donk on the flop.

Check-raised the turn %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise on the turn out of check-raise opportunities on the turn.

Check-called the turn %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise call on the turn out of check-raise opportunities on the turn.

Check-folded the turn %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise fold on the turn out of check-raise opportunities on the turn.

Donk bet the turn %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as donk on the turn out of donk opportunities on the turn.

Folded to a turn donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as fold to donk on the turn out of faced donk on the turn.

Called a turn donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as call donk on the turn out of faced donk on the turn.

Raised a turn donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as raise donk on the turn out of faced donk on the turn.

Check-raised the river %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise on the river out of check-raise opportunities on the river.

Check-called the river %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise call on the river out of check-raise opportunities on the river.

Check-folded the river %. The check-raise / check-call / check-fold split after checking into a bet is the fundamental defensive profile of a street. Check-folds are where c-bets profit; check-raises are what punishes them. Computed as check-raise fold on the river out of check-raise opportunities on the river.

Donk bet the river %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as donk on the river out of donk opportunities on the river.

Folded to a river donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as fold to donk on the river out of faced donk on the river.

Called a river donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as call donk on the river out of faced donk on the river.

Raised a river donk bet %. Donk bets — leading into the previous street’s aggressor — break the usual flow. For most players they skew weak-to-medium made hands; the response splits show who folds out and who fights back. Computed as raise donk on the river out of faced donk on the river.

Probe bet the turn %. Probe bets attack a skipped c-bet from out of position, taking the initiative the aggressor declined. A high probe rate marks a player who pounces on weakness. Computed as probe on the turn out of probe opportunities on the turn.

Folded to a turn probe bet %. Probe bets attack a skipped c-bet from out of position, taking the initiative the aggressor declined. A high probe rate marks a player who pounces on weakness. Computed as fold to probe on the turn out of faced probe on the turn.

Floated the turn (bet after aggressor checked) %. Floating — betting in position after the aggressor checks — converts position into pots. The fold-to-float side shows whether check-callers give up when the turn checks through. Computed as float on the turn out of float opportunities on the turn.

Folded to a turn float %. Floating — betting in position after the aggressor checks — converts position into pots. The fold-to-float side shows whether check-callers give up when the turn checks through. Computed as fold to float on the turn out of faced float on the turn.

Probe bet the river %. Probe bets attack a skipped c-bet from out of position, taking the initiative the aggressor declined. A high probe rate marks a player who pounces on weakness. Computed as probe on the river out of probe opportunities on the river.

Folded to a river probe bet %. Probe bets attack a skipped c-bet from out of position, taking the initiative the aggressor declined. A high probe rate marks a player who pounces on weakness. Computed as fold to probe on the river out of faced probe on the river.

Floated the river (bet after aggressor checked) %. Floating — betting in position after the aggressor checks — converts position into pots. The fold-to-float side shows whether check-callers give up when the turn checks through. Computed as float on the river out of float opportunities on the river.

Folded to a river float %. Floating — betting in position after the aggressor checks — converts position into pots. The fold-to-float side shows whether check-callers give up when the turn checks through. Computed as fold to float on the river out of faced float on the river.

Skipped the flop c-bet, then folded to a bet %. What the preflop raiser does after skipping their c-bet — giving up to a stab, or check-raising — separates surrendered ranges from trappy ones. Computed as skip cbet fold out of skip cbet flop opportunities.

Skipped the flop c-bet, then check-raised %. What the preflop raiser does after skipping their c-bet — giving up to a stab, or check-raising — separates surrendered ranges from trappy ones. Computed as skip cbet check-raise out of skip cbet flop opportunities.

River bets sized over pot (share of river bets). River overbets are the most polarized bets in poker — nutted hands and bluffs, little between. Knowing who is capable of them changes river decisions entirely. Computed as overbet river out of river bets.

Went all-in preflop % (of hands dealt). All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as all in preflop out of total hands played.

Went all-in on the flop % (of flops seen). All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as all in on the flop out of flop seen.

Went all-in on the turn % (of turns seen). All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as all in on the turn out of turn seen.

Went all-in on the river % (of rivers seen). All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as all in on the river out of river seen.

Folded when facing an all-in %. All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as fold to all in out of faced all in.

Called an all-in %. All-in frequencies by street, and the fold/call split when facing a shove, are where the biggest pots get decided. Facing-a-shove numbers converge slowly but pay for themselves. Computed as call all in out of faced all in.

Won when saw flop %. Outcome stats grade results rather than decisions. WWSF (won when saw flop) is the classic postflop-fight metric; won-without-showdown shows how much profit comes from folds rather than showdowns. Computed as won when saw flop out of flop seen.

Won without showdown % (of hands dealt). Outcome stats grade results rather than decisions. WWSF (won when saw flop) is the classic postflop-fight metric; won-without-showdown shows how much profit comes from folds rather than showdowns. Computed as won without showdown out of total hands played.

Won the hand % (of hands dealt). Outcome stats grade results rather than decisions. WWSF (won when saw flop) is the classic postflop-fight metric; won-without-showdown shows how much profit comes from folds rather than showdowns. Computed as hands won out of total hands played.

Average pot won (BB). Outcome stats grade results rather than decisions. WWSF (won when saw flop) is the classic postflop-fight metric; won-without-showdown shows how much profit comes from folds rather than showdowns. Computed as total pot won sum bbx100 divided by hands won, shown in big blinds.

Won at showdown after raising turn or river %. Outcome stats grade results rather than decisions. WWSF (won when saw flop) is the classic postflop-fight metric; won-without-showdown shows how much profit comes from folds rather than showdowns. Computed as won at showdown after tr raise out of went to showdown after tr raise.